Why Domo customers are looking at Snowflake now
The pairing usually comes from a Domo renewal. Progress Software's asset purchase of Domo's business closed in September 2026, and the product is being merged into the wider Progress Data Platform. Progress has said it will keep supporting customers, but there is no published long-term roadmap or pricing yet. Teams that already copy the same data into Snowflake start asking whether they could drop the second home for it and use Cortex for the question-answering part.
That framing undersells how much Domo does. Domo ships more than 1,000 connectors that load data straight into its cloud, Magic ETL for visual data prep, Beast Mode calculations, Cards and pages that hold up well on phones, and mature alerting and scheduling. Domo.AI adds an AI Agent Builder, an AI Library, toolkits, and an MCP Server that exposes governed Domo data to assistants like Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT.
What Cortex covers, and what it leaves out
Snowflake Cortex starts from the opposite assumption: the data is already in Snowflake and should never leave. Cortex Analyst reads a Semantic View, a YAML file of metrics, joins, synonyms, and verified queries, and writes SQL that runs under the roles and row-level policies you already maintain. Snowflake Intelligence gives business users a chat surface, and the REST API lets a platform team put the same capability into Slack, Teams, or a Streamlit app.
What Cortex does not include is everything around the question. There are no connectors, no visual ETL, no dashboard pages, and no alert schedules. A Domo replacement built on Cortex means Snowflake for storage, a separate ingestion tool, dbt or similar for modeling, and a BI tool for recurring reporting, with Cortex as the conversational layer on top. That stack can be cleaner than Domo, but it is a project, not a toggle.
How the bills behave
Domo charges across users, ingestion, ETL runs, storage, and Domo.AI usage, and G2 reviewers often describe that consumption model as hard to forecast, with some reporting steep renewal increases. Cortex Analyst bills per successful message, and the warehouse compute for each generated query is billed on top. Neither is a flat line item, so model both against your real query volume before assuming one is cheaper.